AI has created an era of haves and have-nots.  AI-native companies with spectacular growth rates are grabbing all the attention, talent and money.  Is this insanity?  How long will it last?  If you’re not among the ranks of the AI-native high flyers, how do you avoid becoming seen as a zombie, a living-dead SaaS company with uninteresting growth, little profit, and no future?  

First, it’s important to understand the external environment.  While the world may seem insane, it’s not.  We are at the start of a major disruptive cycle on the order of client/server computing or the Internet.  Such cycles come maybe every 20 years in my experience, just long enough for us to have forgotten what they feel like.  

These technology disruptions create opportunities to build enormously valuable companies that will lead their markets for a generation.  This is the system at work.  It’s chaotic.  It’s inefficient.  It feels crazy when you’re in it.  But always remember that from the wreckage of Webvan, Pets.com, and a hundred other dot-coms, sprung Amazon, Google, and Salesforce.  Nobody said creative destruction came without casualties.  

These cycles reflect the nature of venture capital.  While fixer-upper private equity (PE) has always been about driving modest growth with ever-increasing EBITDA margins, venture capital (VC) has always been a hits business.  I remember nearly a decade ago reading the prospectus of a top-tier fund which said that the internal rate of return (IRR) of their previous fund was 36%, but that dropped to 12% with the top two investments omitted.  Most of what makes VC a great investment, worth the 10-12 year illiquidity, comes from a handful of fund-returning companies.  While consistent base hits are the PE business model, the VC model is not just about home runs, but grand slams.

Viewed in this light, today’s ARR multiples seem much less insane.  After all, if a company is going to be worth $20B at exit, it doesn’t matter much if you bought at a valuation of $50M or $80M.  This is what drives the valuation insensitivity and fear-of-missing-out (FOMO) that we see today in AI.  Moreover, if you remember that in greenfield platform markets, first place ends up worth 10-100x second place, and second 10-100x third, you should be willing to pay almost anything to get into the leader.  And if you’re currently in second place, you should be willing to spend almost anything to get into first.  Second prize really is a set of steak knives.

While some will question the durability of high-growth AI revenue, to many investors it’s surprisingly unimportant.  Yes, a lot of the $100M in revenues (that a company hit in 18 months) may not recur, but 70% of something is worth a lot more than 100% of nothing.  Thus, we are seeing a surprising lack of interest in traditional SaaS metrics and the very notion of ARR -- particularly the recurring part -- is starting to lose meaning.  Increasingly, companies are just talking about revenue or product revenue because today’s pricing models (e.g., consumption, outcomes) no longer align to subscriptions and traditional SaaS metrics.  

While we can’t help wondering how long this will last, that’s the wrong question. It will last until it doesn’t.  Shorting bubbles is a dangerous business because the market can stay irrational longer than you can stay liquid.  Eventually, some trigger will start an unwind cycle. And once again, we will learn that this time wasn’t different from all the times before.

If you’re an AI-native growth company, the strategy is simple:  win.  Take no prisoners.  Grind 9-9-6.  Grow faster than your competitors, blunt all attempts to overtake you.  In the words of Larry Ellison, it’s not enough that you win, all others must lose.  Hire people who are so aggressive they make you uncomfortable.  Think:  “you want me on the wall, you need me on that wall.”

But what if you’re not?  Per Jason Lemkin et al., you probably can’t raise new money.  Even T2D3 (triple, triple, double, double, double) — a growth trajectory that takes you from $0 to $100M in seven to nine years — is no longer interesting to 80% of VCs.  Instead of T2D3, we hear of Q2T3 (quadruple, quadruple, triple, triple, triple).  We now measure time to $100M in ARR in months, not years.  And, by the way, do it with a tiny team, driving ARR/head of $1M+.

That the bar has been raised so high is a mixed blessing because now there’s no kidding yourself.  There’s no pitching a cloud story while still selling on-premises.  The bluff factor has been eliminated.  If you want to raise money at an AI valuation, then you don’t just need an AI story, you need an AI growth rate to match it.  Clear and simple, but far from easy.

In a world of haves and have-nots, you want to be a have.

- Dave Kellogg

If 80% of VCs aren’t interested in talking to you, how might you win over the other 20%?

Hunkering down is not good enough.  Particularly if hunker means something like 10% growth and 5% EBITDA at $30M in ARR.  Financially, that business might be worth 10-20x FCF, so $15M to $30M.  That’s not bad if you’re bootstrapped and you’re a founder who owns 100% of the company.  But, even then, that works only if there is confidence that the $1.5M in annual EBITDA will continue.  That is, that you won’t be disrupted by AI natives who vibe code your replacement app over the weekend.  However, if the same business raised $50M in VC then it’s effectively worthless, because the entire business is worth less than preference stack.

So how do you create value?  One word:  growth.  Growth is what takes you from an EBITDA-based multiple to a revenue-based multiple.  Mathematically, a point of growth is worth about 2.3x a point of profit.  One way or another you have to figure out growth. 

But how?

  1. Make growth at positive FCF the top financial goal.  Note that this is not a strategy, but a constraint.

  2. Build an AI story. Do an inside round, raise debt, or even cut traditional R&D if you need to, but you have to find money to build an AI product and story.  If you get it right, it will not only enable current sales but increase your value at exit.

  3. Be relentless in sales model optimization.  You are fighting for your corporate life.  This isn’t about arguing with the board about how much to invest in growth.  You are highly constrained, but let those constraints drive creativity.  Do market research.  Do win/loss analysis.  Get good at listening. Figure out what you can do to improve sales productivity.  Often, that will be doubling down on a key segment.  Or stopping in an unproductive segment.  Or changing key assumptions in your sales model (e.g., SC to AE ratio, AE hiring/cost profile) that might have been heretical to consider in the past.

  4. Consolidate the space.  Investors who have “no money” for operational experiments often do have money for new strategies.  If you’re competing with the usual suspects in every deal and everyone is struggling, then consolidate the space.  It should increase both win rates and prices.  

  5. Fresh eyes.  You might think you’ve tried everything already over the past few years.  But have you?  And if you tried something and it didn’t work, was that because it was a bad idea or because you didn’t execute it well?  Beware false knowledge that blinds you to solutions.  Or bring in fresh eyes to challenge your assumptions.  Yes, it’s not going to be easy, and yes you’ve tried a lot already, but you need to look at things with fresh eyes to find fresh solutions.

In a world of haves and have-nots, you want to be a have. And the key to doing that, no matter how many times you’ve tried before, is to figure out growth.

This Week Across Topline

This Made Us Think

  • Cerebras CEO on $1BN Raise & AI's Future - Andrew Feldman: Fascinating look at the AI chip race from an industry veteran. Feldman's insights on the unprecedented demand, talent wars, and geopolitical dynamics shaping AI's future are a sobering reality check on the hype, highlighting both the immense opportunities and challenges ahead.

  • The Future of AI Agents | Jesse Zhang Interview - Invest Like The Best: A deep dive into the cutting-edge world of AI CS agents, offering a vision of how conversational AI could become the primary interface between brands and consumers. Zhang's insights paint a vivid picture of the intense competition and rapid innovation happening in this space.

  • The $80 Billion Founder Who Automates Everything: Thomas Petterfy - Founders Podcast: Catch a glimpse into the life of Thomas Peterffy, the man who revolutionized trading through relentless automation and unconventional thinking. His journey from post-war Hungary to building a $120 billion company is a masterclass in persistence, innovation, and the power of challenging industry norms.

Become a Topline insider by joining our Slack channel.

This Made Us Think: Curated by Kyler Verney.

We want to hear your feedback! Let us know your thoughts.

Keep reading

No posts found